Residential proxies are the most misunderstood product in the proxy market. They're also the most expensive per unit of data, the most frequently over-purchased, and the single most effective tool available when a website has decided it doesn't want automated traffic. Understanding when they're necessary β and when they're an expensive way to do something a cheaper product handles fine β is worth more than any technical trick in this guide.
This guide covers what residential proxies are at the network level, how the networks are assembled, how pricing actually works, how to configure them in real tools, and how to cut your bandwidth bill by 80% without changing your success rate.
What a Residential Proxy Actually Is
Start with the ordinary case. When your laptop connects to the internet, your internet service provider assigns you an IP address from a block they own. That block is registered to a consumer ISP β Comcast, BT, Deutsche Telekom, Jio β and anyone who looks it up can see that. It's an address that belongs to a household.
A residential proxy routes your request through one of those household connections. Your traffic goes to the proxy network's gateway, gets forwarded to a real residential device somewhere in the world, and exits from that device's ISP-assigned IP. The target website sees a request arriving from an ordinary home broadband connection in, say, Ohio β because at the network layer that is precisely what it is.
The contrast that makes this valuable: a datacenter proxy exits from an IP registered to a hosting company. Those ranges are catalogued, published, and trivially identifiable. Any website can buy or build a list of datacenter IP ranges and treat traffic from them differently. There's nothing subtle about it β the IP announces its own origin before you've sent a single header.
Residential IPs carry no such marker. They look like people, because they belong to people.
The three-hop path
Understanding the request path explains most of the product's characteristics:
- Your client sends a request to the provider's gateway, authenticated with credentials
- The gateway selects an exit node matching your targeting parameters and forwards the request
- The exit node makes the request to the target site and passes the response back through the same path
Three consequences fall directly out of this:
- Latency is higher. You've added two extra network hops, one of which is a consumer connection with consumer-grade upload speed.
- Reliability is variable. Exit nodes are real devices. They get turned off, lose signal, or move to a different network mid-session.
- Bandwidth costs money. Every byte traverses infrastructure the provider pays for and, in most models, compensates the node operator for.
That third point is why residential is billed per gigabyte while datacenter is billed per IP. It's not arbitrary pricing strategy β it reflects genuinely different cost structures.
How Residential Proxy Networks Are Built
This is the part of the industry most providers discuss vaguely, and it's worth understanding both practically and ethically.
Residential IPs can't be bought in blocks the way datacenter IPs can. ISPs allocate them to subscribers, not to businesses buying wholesale. So a residential proxy network has to be assembled from the connections of actual people who agree to share bandwidth. There are a few established mechanisms:
- Paid opt-in applications. A user installs software that pays them β in cash, credits, or a service β in exchange for routing third-party traffic through their connection while idle.
- SDK bundling with disclosure. A free app includes a proxy SDK, and the app is free because the user is contributing bandwidth. Done properly, this is disclosed at install time with a clear opt-in.
- Free-service exchange. A VPN, ad blocker, or utility is offered at no charge, with the bandwidth contribution as the stated price.
- ISP partnerships. Some providers work directly with ISPs to obtain address space, which produces static residential IPs β covered in the ISP proxy guide.
The ethical dividing line is informed consent. Bundling a proxy SDK into a flashlight app with a single line buried on page nine of a EULA is legally arguable and reputationally indefensible. Several providers have been publicly criticized for exactly this, and at least one major network was found routing traffic through devices whose owners had no meaningful idea it was happening.
Why sourcing should matter to you specifically
It's easy to treat this as someone else's problem. Three reasons it isn't:
- Procurement will ask. If you're operating inside a company of any size, at some point legal or security will want to know where the IPs came from. "I don't know" is a bad answer.
- Pool quality tracks sourcing quality. Consensually sourced networks have more stable, longer-lived nodes. Networks assembled through deception have high churn, because devices drop off when users discover what's happening.
- Regulatory exposure is growing. Data protection regulators have shown increasing interest in the consent mechanics of these networks.
Prefer providers who publish a sourcing policy, describe the compensation model, and offer a mechanism for node operators to withdraw. Vague marketing language about "ethically sourced IPs" with no detail behind it is a yellow flag, not a green one.
Rotating vs. Sticky Sessions
Every residential provider supports two modes, and choosing wrong is the most common cause of "these proxies don't work."
Rotating gives you a different exit IP on every request. This is the right default for fetching many unrelated pages β a thousand product URLs, a list of blog posts, a set of independent lookups. Each request is stateless, so it doesn't matter that each one comes from a different place.
Sticky holds the same exit IP for a defined window, typically anywhere from one minute to two hours depending on the provider. You need this whenever the target maintains state about you:
- You're logged into an account
- The site set a session cookie you need to send back
- You're paginating through results and the site tracks position server-side
- You're filling a multi-step form or a checkout flow
- The site issued a token tied to your IP
The failure mode when you get this wrong is distinctive and confusing: the first request succeeds, and then everything afterwards fails or returns inconsistent data. From the site's perspective, a session that started in Chicago just continued from Lisbon, which no real user does.
Session control syntax
Almost every provider encodes session control in the proxy username. The exact keywords vary, but the structure is near-universal:
Reading that string:
country-usrequests an exit in the United Statessession-a7f3k2is an arbitrary identifier you generate; the same identifier returns the same IPsessiontime-30requests that the IP be held for thirty minutes
Generate a fresh session identifier when you want a new IP. Omit the session parameters entirely and you rotate per request. Once you understand this string, you understand 90% of residential proxy operation β everything else is plumbing.
> Tip: Generate one session ID per worker thread, not one per request. If you have twenty parallel workers each holding a sticky session, you get twenty concurrent identities that each behave consistently, which is far more natural-looking than either extreme.
Geo-Targeting: Country, State, City, ASN
Geographic targeting is a large part of why residential proxies exist, and the granularity matters more than people expect.
- Country-level is universal across providers. Adequate for "does this site behave differently outside my market."
- State or region-level matters for countries where pricing, tax, availability, or legal notices vary internally β the US, Canada, Australia, Brazil, India.
- City-level is where localized data becomes genuinely accurate rather than approximate. Search results, local business listings, delivery availability, regional promotions, and ad targeting are frequently city-specific. Checking a "local" ranking from a random IP in the same country produces data that looks plausible and is wrong.
- ASN-level targets a specific network operator. Useful when a target treats traffic differently by carrier, or when you need to replicate a specific network's routing.
The practical rule: buy the granularity your data requires, and don't pay for more. If you're scraping a global catalog with uniform pricing, country targeting is fine. If you're auditing local pack rankings for a client with twelve locations, city targeting isn't a luxury, it's the entire requirement.
The pool-size and targeting tradeoff
Providers advertise enormous pool sizes β tens of millions of IPs. Two caveats worth internalizing:
- Pool size is global, not local. A 50 million IP pool might have 15 million in the US and forty thousand in a mid-size European country. When you filter to a specific city, you may be working with a few hundred addresses.
- Concurrent availability is smaller than total pool. Nodes are only usable when online. The number of IPs available to you at any given moment is a fraction of the headline figure.
Neither is a criticism β it's how these networks work. But it means "50 million IPs" doesn't mean you'll never see a repeat when you're targeting Tallinn.
How Residential Proxies Are Priced
Three models exist. Understand all three before you buy anything.
Per gigabyte is the dominant model. You buy a bandwidth allowance and consume it. Rates typically fall as commitment rises β a small starter pack might run in the four-to-six dollars per gigabyte range, mid-tier plans in the two-to-four range, and large commitments considerably lower. The rate you're quoted on a comparison site is usually the volume rate, not the entry rate.
Per Mbps of throughput β sometimes marketed as "unlimited residential" β charges for sustained connection speed rather than data volume. Your bandwidth ceiling caps how fast you can go, but total consumption is unmetered. This suits continuous high-volume ingestion and is covered fully in the unlimited residential guide.
Per successful request appears mainly in managed scraping APIs, where you're buying results rather than infrastructure.
The costs people forget
Your effective per-gigabyte cost is almost always higher than the sticker rate, because of:
- Failed requests. You pay for the bandwidth of a request that returned a 403. At a 50% success rate, your real cost per usable response is double the headline number.
- Redirects. Each hop in a redirect chain is billable traffic.
- Assets in headless browsers. Images, fonts, CSS, tracking scripts, and video all count. A browser-driven crawl can consume ten times the bandwidth of an equivalent HTTP-only crawl.
- Retries. Every retry is a fresh billable request.
- Expiry. Many providers expire unused bandwidth at the end of a billing period. Some allow rollover. Check before committing to a large pack.
Estimating your actual consumption
The formula worth running before you buy:
Work an example. Two hundred thousand requests a month, a 70% success rate, an average response of 200KB:
Fifty-seven gigabytes, not the forty you'd have estimated from request count alone. And notice what the success rate divisor implies: improving success from 70% to 95% drops consumption to roughly 42GB β a 26% cost reduction from engineering work alone, with no change to your plan.
> Tip: Measure average response size on a hundred-request sample before committing to a plan. Almost everyone guesses low, usually by a factor of two or three.
When Residential Is the Right Choice
Use residential proxies when at least one of these is true:
- The target actively blocks datacenter traffic. You've tested with datacenter IPs and the success rate is unusable.
- Geography changes the data itself. Prices, search results, ads, availability, and legal notices are frequently regionalized. If your data is wrong when collected from the wrong country, you need geographic control.
- The target runs meaningful bot detection. Major ecommerce platforms, travel aggregators, ticketing, sneaker retail, social platforms, and ad networks all fall here.
- You need to look like a consumer segment. Ad verification in particular requires appearing as the targeted audience, or you see a different ad than the one under investigation.
- Request count is high but payload is small. Per-GB billing rewards lots of small requests and punishes few large ones.
When Residential Is the Wrong Choice
Don't use residential when:
- The target doesn't care. Plenty of sites have no bot detection at all. Paying residential rates to scrape a site that would have accepted datacenter traffic is pure waste, and it's the single most common overspend in this market.
- You're moving large files. Downloading PDFs, images, video, or large datasets through per-GB billing is punishing. Use unlimited-bandwidth datacenter IPs.
- You need one stable IP for weeks. Rotating residential is the wrong shape. Use static residential (ISP) proxies.
- Latency is critical. Residential adds real latency. If you need sub-100ms response times, this isn't the product.
- You're managing logged-in accounts long-term. Rotating IPs on a persistent account is actively harmful β see the fingerprinting section.
The discipline worth building: always test the cheap option first. Run five hundred requests through datacenter IPs against your actual target and measure the success rate. If it's above 80%, you've just saved a large amount of money. If it's under 40%, escalate without further optimization β you're not going to header-tune your way out of a datacenter block.
Setting Up Residential Proxies
The setup sequence that catches problems earliest:
- Get your credentials from the provider dashboard β gateway hostname, port, username, password.
- Choose an authentication method. IP whitelisting works if you have a static public IP and is slightly faster. Username/password works from anywhere and is required for encoding targeting parameters.
- Test with a single curl request before touching your actual tooling.
- Verify the exit IP using an IP echo service and confirm it isn't yours.
- Verify geo-targeting by checking the reported location matches what you requested.
- Only then integrate into your scraper or tool.
The baseline test:
If that returns an address that isn't yours, the proxy works and every subsequent problem is a configuration issue in your tool. Establishing that boundary early saves hours.
To confirm targeting, use a geolocation echo:
If you asked for Germany and got Germany, your parameter syntax is correct.
Integration by Tool
Python β requests and httpx
proxy = "http://USER:PASS@GATEWAY:PORT"
proxies = {"http": proxy, "https": proxy}
r = requests.get("https://example.com", proxies=proxies, timeout=30)
print(r.status_code, len(r.content))
The https value uses the http:// scheme. This trips up nearly everyone the first time. You connect to the proxy over HTTP; the proxy then tunnels your HTTPS connection via CONNECT.
For per-worker sticky sessions:
def session_proxies(country="us", minutes=15):
sid = uuid.uuid4().hex[:8]
user = f"USERNAME-country-{country}-session-{sid}-sessiontime-{minutes}"
url = f"http://{user}:PASSWORD@GATEWAY:PORT"
return {"http": url, "https": url}
Scrapy
Set the proxy per-request in a downloader middleware rather than globally, so you can vary geography and session across a single crawl:
def process_request(self, request, spider):
country = request.meta.get("geo", "us")
sid = request.meta.get("session_id", "default")
user = f"USERNAME-country-{country}-session-{sid}-sessiontime-10"
request.meta["proxy"] = f"http://{user}:PASSWORD@GATEWAY:PORT"
Then set DOWNLOADTIMEOUT to at least 30, add 403 and 429 to RETRYHTTP_CODES, and enable AUTOTHROTTLE.
Node β axios and got
const agent = new HttpsProxyAgent('http://USER:PASS@GATEWAY:PORT');
const res = await axios.get('https://example.com', {
httpsAgent: agent,
timeout: 30000
});
Playwright and Puppeteer
Browsers won't accept inline credentials in the proxy string, so authentication is separate:
const browser = await chromium.launch({
proxy: {
server: 'http://GATEWAY:PORT',
username: 'USERNAME-country-us-session-abc-sessiontime-20',
password: 'PASSWORD'
}
});
const browser = await puppeteer.launch({
args: ['--proxy-server=http://GATEWAY:PORT']
});
const page = await browser.newPage();
await page.authenticate({ username: 'USERNAME', password: 'PASSWORD' });
curl and system-wide
export HTTPS_PROXY="http://USER:PASS@GATEWAY:PORT"
export NO_PROXY="localhost,127.0.0.1"
Unset these when you're finished, or you'll lose an afternoon wondering why an unrelated tool is behaving strangely.
Desktop and no-code tools
Most SEO tools, scraping platforms, and anti-detect browsers expect either a full proxy URL or the colon-delimited form host:port:username:password. If a tool rejects your string, that's almost always the format mismatch β try the other one before assuming the proxy is broken.
Bandwidth Optimization
On per-GB billing, engineering effort converts directly into money saved. These are ordered roughly by impact.
- Block non-essential resources in headless browsers. Images, media, fonts, stylesheets, and analytics scripts frequently account for 80β90% of page weight. Request interception that allows only documents, XHR, and scripts you actually need routinely cuts consumption by an order of magnitude.
- Use JSON endpoints instead of HTML. Most modern sites fetch their data from an internal API. Finding that endpoint and calling it directly can replace a 400KB rendered page with a 12KB JSON response.
- Skip the browser entirely where possible. Headless browsers are the single largest bandwidth multiplier in scraping. If the data is in the initial HTML, use an HTTP client.
- Request compression. Send
Accept-Encoding: gzip, brand let your client decompress. Most libraries do this by default, but verify β some configurations disable it. - Send HEAD requests when you only need status. Link checking, availability monitoring, and redirect tracing rarely need the body.
- Deduplicate before you crawl. Filter your URL list for duplicates, already-seen pages, and obvious dead ends before spending bandwidth on them.
- Cache aggressively. Never fetch the same URL twice in a run. Persist a seen-set across runs where the content is stable.
- Set response size limits. Abort requests that exceed a sane threshold. One unexpected 200MB file can eat a meaningful chunk of a small plan.
> Tip: Instrument your crawler to log bytes consumed per successful record extracted. That single metric tells you more about your cost efficiency than anything else, and it makes optimization work measurable instead of theoretical.
Success Rate Engineering
Success rate is the other lever, and it compounds with bandwidth optimization. Every failed request costs bandwidth and produces nothing.
Concurrency tuning
More threads is not more throughput past a threshold β it's more blocks and more timeouts. A workable method:
- Start at ten concurrent requests
- Run five hundred requests and record the success rate
- Double concurrency and repeat
- Continue until success rate begins to drop
- Step back one level and settle there
Track successful requests per minute, not raw requests per minute. Two hundred threads at a 30% success rate is slower in real terms than fifty threads at 95%, and costs three times the bandwidth.
Retry logic that helps rather than hurts
- Use exponential backoff with jitter, never a fixed interval β fixed intervals create a detectable rhythm
- Cap retries at three or four; beyond that you're paying to re-fetch something that isn't going to succeed
- Change the IP on retry. Retrying through the same blocked exit node is spending money to fail again
- Treat error classes differently: a 429 means slow down and keep the IP, a 403 means change identity, a 5xx often means try again unchanged
Timing and pacing
- Add randomized delays between requests. Perfectly regular intervals are a machine signature
- Vary your concurrency over time rather than running a flat rate for hours
- Respect the target's rhythm β hitting a regional site at 3am local time at full speed is conspicuous
Why the IP Is Only Half the Problem
The most expensive mistake in this space is assuming a good IP is sufficient. Modern bot detection scores dozens of signals, and origin is only one of them.
Header consistency. Send a complete, coherent header set β Accept, Accept-Language, Accept-Encoding, Referer, and the Sec-Fetch-* family. Keep them in the order the browser you're claiming to be would send them. Header order alone is a fingerprint.
Locale alignment. A German exit IP sending Accept-Language: en-US only, with a America/New_York timezone in JavaScript, is internally inconsistent. Everything should agree: IP country, language header, timezone, and currency preference.
User agent plausibility. Rotate user agents, but only among current, real browser strings. A five-year-old Chrome version is its own red flag, and a user agent that doesn't match the TLS fingerprint your client actually produces is worse than not rotating at all.
TLS fingerprinting. Your HTTP client has a distinctive TLS handshake signature. Python's requests does not produce a handshake that looks like Chrome, regardless of what user agent you claim. For hard targets, use a client designed to mimic browser TLS profiles.
Behavioral signals. Real users load pages irregularly, follow links, scroll, and pause. A crawler that requests exactly one page per second and never loads an asset behaves nothing like a person, from any IP.
Cookie handling. If a site sets a cookie, send it back. A client that discards cookies and re-triggers the same challenge repeatedly is trivially identifiable.
The practical implication: if you're getting CAPTCHAs from clean residential IPs, the problem is almost certainly fingerprint consistency, not IP quality. Buying more expensive proxies will not fix it.
Troubleshooting
Symptoms and their usual causes:
- 407 Proxy Authentication Required β credentials are wrong, or your current public IP isn't on the whitelist. Re-copy from the dashboard; if you're on dynamic home broadband, your whitelisted IP has probably changed.
- 403 on every request, from every IP β the target is blocking something other than your IP. Check headers, TLS fingerprint, and locale consistency before blaming the proxy.
- 403 on some requests only β normal residential behavior. Some exit nodes are already flagged on some targets. Retry with a new session ID.
- 429 Too Many Requests β your concurrency or frequency is too high for the target. Reduce threads, add delay, widen the IP spread.
- Frequent timeouts β your timeout is set for datacenter latency. Raise it to 30β60 seconds. Residential nodes are consumer connections and are genuinely slower.
- SSL or certificate errors β usually a scheme mismatch. Use
http://for the proxy URL even when the target is HTTPS. - Works in curl, fails in your tool β a formatting problem. The tool likely wants
host:port:user:passrather than a URL, or vice versa. - Geo-targeting appears ignored β parameter syntax is provider-specific. Verify the exact keywords in your dashboard rather than copying from a generic tutorial.
- Session keeps changing unexpectedly β either you omitted the session parameters, exceeded the maximum session duration, or the exit node went offline. The last one happens and your code should handle it.
- Bandwidth disappearing far faster than expected β you're loading assets you don't need, following redirect chains, or retrying aggressively. Instrument bytes-per-record and find out where it's going.
The general debugging order is always: curl first, then your tool, then your code. Establish where the failure occurs before changing anything.
Evaluating a Residential Provider
Beyond price, the criteria that actually predict whether a provider will work for you:
- Pool size in your specific target geography, not the global headline number
- Targeting granularity β country, state, city, ASN
- Maximum sticky session duration and whether it's configurable
- Protocol support β HTTP(S) and SOCKS5, or just one
- Concurrent connection limits, and whether they're capped or unlimited
- Bandwidth rollover policy β does unused data expire at period end?
- Trial or refund window, and how short it is. Some are as brief as 72 hours, which means you must test immediately rather than getting to it next week
- Sourcing transparency β published consent and compensation model
- Documentation quality, particularly for the username parameter syntax
- Support responsiveness, which matters most when a pool degrades on a specific target
The most useful evaluation method is a paid trial against your actual target. Generic speed tests and anonymity checkers tell you almost nothing about whether a pool works on the specific site you care about. Run a thousand real requests and measure the success rate.
Legal and Ethical Boundaries
Proxies are neutral infrastructure. What passes through them isn't.
- Public data collection and authentication circumvention are legally distinct. Scraping publicly accessible pages sits on very different ground from bypassing a login. Know which you're doing.
- Data protection law applies regardless of routing. If you collect personal data on EU residents, GDPR applies whether you used a proxy or not.
- Terms of service are contracts, not criminal statutes β but they can be enforceable, and breaching them carries real commercial risk.
- Rate-limit yourself as a matter of basic conduct. A crawler that degrades someone's site is a problem regardless of legality.
- Don't collect personal data you have no lawful basis to hold, and don't retain it longer than you need it.
This isn't legal advice, and jurisdictions differ substantially. If you're operating commercially at scale, have a lawyer review your specific use case.
Residential Compared to Every Other Option
Positioning residential against the alternatives, honestly:
Versus datacenter proxies. Datacenter is faster, cheaper, and usually sold with unlimited bandwidth. It fails on any target that checks IP origin. Datacenter should always be your first test; residential is the escalation.
Versus ISP (static residential) proxies. ISP gives you residential-registered addresses hosted on datacenter infrastructure β so you get residential trust plus datacenter speed and stability, with a static IP. The tradeoff is pool size: ISP pools are orders of magnitude smaller. Use ISP for persistent identities, rotating residential for scale and diversity.
Versus mobile proxies. Mobile carries higher trust because carrier-grade NAT means one IP serves thousands of real subscribers, making blocks costly for the site. It's also more expensive and drawn from a smaller pool. Escalate to mobile only when residential is failing or the target is social/mobile-specific.
Versus VPNs. A commercial VPN gives you a handful of shared datacenter endpoints with no programmatic rotation, no geo-granularity below country, and IP ranges that are widely blocked. VPNs are a privacy tool for humans; proxies are infrastructure for automation. They are not interchangeable.
Versus a managed scraping API. An API sells you results instead of infrastructure. You stop maintaining rotation, retry, and unblocking logic, and you pay per successful request. Cheaper in engineering time, more expensive per unit, and less flexible. Worth it when the data is standard (search results, common marketplaces) and not worth it when you need arbitrary targets.
Architecture Patterns That Work
A few structural patterns worth adopting before you scale.
Tiered escalation. Route every request through datacenter first. On failure, retry through residential. On residential failure, retry through mobile. Most requests resolve at the cheapest tier, and your blended cost per successful request drops dramatically. This is the single largest cost optimization available to most operations and almost nobody implements it.
A proxy abstraction layer. Don't scatter proxy strings through your codebase. Put a single module in front of all outbound requests that owns credential construction, session ID generation, geo selection, rotation policy, and retry behavior. When you change providers β and you will, at some point β you change one file.
Per-domain policy. Different targets need different treatment. Maintain a configuration keyed by domain that specifies proxy tier, concurrency, delay, session stickiness, and retry ceiling. Treating a permissive blog and a hardened marketplace identically means either over-paying on one or getting blocked on the other.
Failure classification and telemetry. Log every failure with its status code, proxy tier, geography, and target domain. Within a week you'll be able to see which targets need escalation, which geographies underperform, and where your bandwidth is actually going. Without this you're guessing.
Graceful degradation. Exit nodes drop mid-request. That's normal, not exceptional. Build for it: idempotent request handling, checkpointed crawls that can resume, and no assumption that a session survives to completion.
Separate pools by workload. Don't run your high-burn link checking and your delicate account-linked work through the same identities. Segment them, so damage in one doesn't contaminate the other.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are residential proxies legal?
The proxies themselves are ordinary network infrastructure and legal to use. What you do with them is governed by the same laws that would apply without a proxy.
Why are they so much more expensive than datacenter proxies?
Because the underlying cost structure is different. The provider compensates node operators for bandwidth and maintains a distributed network of consumer devices, rather than renting server IPs in bulk.
How many IPs do I actually need?
It's the wrong question for rotating residential β you don't hold IPs, you consume bandwidth. Focus on how much data you'll move and what success rate you can sustain.
Rotating or sticky?
Sticky whenever session state exists. Rotating for independent, stateless page fetches.
Will residential proxies stop me getting blocked?
They remove one very large signal. They do nothing about headers, TLS fingerprint, timing, or behavior. On sophisticated targets, those matter more.
Can I use residential proxies for streaming or gaming?
Technically yes, practically no. Per-GB billing makes video prohibitively expensive, and consumer-connection latency makes gaming unpleasant.
What's the difference between residential and ISP proxies?
ISP proxies are static residential IPs hosted in datacenters β residential trust with datacenter speed and stability, but a much smaller pool. Rotating residential gives you scale and diversity instead.
Do I need mobile proxies instead?
Only if residential is being blocked on your target, or you're working with mobile-specific content or social platforms. Mobile is more expensive and the pools are smaller.
Where to Get Residential Proxies
If you're ready to test residential proxies against your own target, ProxyScrape's residential network is a reasonable place to start β a pool of 55 million-plus rotating IPs with country, state, and city-level targeting, sticky sessions up to around two hours, both HTTP(S) and SOCKS5 support, and per-GB pricing that starts small enough to run a genuine test without a large commitment. Their residential IPs are sourced with user consent under a published ethical sourcing policy, which is worth having on record if anyone in your organization asks where the addresses came from.
β Compare residential proxy plans and start with a small test pack
Residential proxies solve a specific problem extremely well and solve every other problem expensively. Test the cheaper tier first, escalate only when you have evidence you need to, and spend your optimization effort on bandwidth and success rate rather than on buying a bigger plan. The operators who run this profitably aren't the ones with the largest bandwidth allowance β they're the ones who figured out how little of it they actually needed.